To buy or not to buy....

By -
Quick question about "out of print" books:  Do you buy them for your collections?  If you do not, why not?  If you do, do you only buy one copy?  What's the lowest condition you're willing to get?  What's the most you're willing to pay?  Do you only buy under certain conditions?  (part of a series, classic, local interest, etc?)  And, what do you do if it suddenly gets 60 holds on the single copy?

Thanks!

Comments

Kristen N said…
We often buy out of print copies of anything by local (the entire state) authors or on a local topic. Condition-wise, we have ended up with some bad ones. It's basically anything better than the copy we're trying to replace. And we regularly send things to the bindery.

The only other thing we'll buy used is decent copies of really popular large print titles that have fallen apart. Large print is huge. I get a daily email from Powells for just their 'new' large print offerings.

The rest, the patron has to use ILL. But we never charge for ILL.
November 8, 2013 at 9:00 AM
Pseudo Super mum said…
We too often buy out of print copies - teachers put classic texts on reading lists, and music text print-runs are often quite short so it's buy 2ndhand, or don't buy at all. (Follow us @ whittakerlive.blogspot.com)
November 8, 2013 at 1:31 PM
Helen Saunders said…
Don't know where to start with this! I work in an academic library, looking after Welsh, a field in which a high proportion of material on reading lists and in high demand is out of print (often only ever published in short runs in the first place). I wish more of this stuff was available as print-on-demand, but it isn't. Trying to locate out of print books which don't cost silly amounts is a source of much frustration, all the time! see my own blog for occasional rants on the subject

November 8, 2013 at 1:46 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tips for Weeding Your Reference Collection

By -
If you are responsible for collection development in just about any size or kind of library, the chances are good that there's been a recent push to reduce the size of your print reference collection.* Print reference materials are, to use a regional expression, wicked expensive. They are also being used less and less as librarians turn to databases and patrons turn to the immediate gratification of the internet. As budgets decline and libraries look to use their space in new and creative ways, physical reference collections are obvious targets for heavy weeding. Here at my library, we are reducing our reference collection by 50%. At our branches, reference collections will be cut by 75% . . . this time around. So where do you start when you are lucky enough to get the assignment to chop chop chop? Before You Begin Get a firm idea of how much the administration wants to reduce the reference collection. Survey the collection and determine how much you're going to have to weed...
Read more

What the Heck is Denewing?

By -
Image
"Denewing" is the term I invented for the process of taking books from the new shelf and changing their status to, for lack of a better word, "not-new." Sure, I could farm the work out to other people in my library, but it's never been clear to me why I would when denewing presents the perfect opportunity to see what has been circulating, how many times, and (thanks to Evergreen, our new ILS) the last library at which an item was checked out. Plus, peeling stickers = therapeutic. Denewing is something I can do on desk while I help people with their various computer issues. Denewing also makes your new shelves look better. Because space is at such a premium in most public libraries (although regular weeding could help with that-- cough ), the New Shelf is the place where we have the best opportunity to showcase what we're buying and catch people's attention. The new shelf should be positioned somewhere where it will catch patrons' eyes and shout (it...
Read more

The black shelves are over there.......

By -
Speaking of collection maintenance... A question that has come up time and time again (in the real world, in the twitter world, on blogs, at conferences...) is the idea of separate shelving for African American books. If you follow me on twitter, you've heard this rant before. Why do we segregate books by skin color, blah blah blah. And, really, it isn't even the skin color of the character that matters, but the skin color of the author . You won't find the Derek Strange books (by Pelecanos...go read them now!) the AF-AM section. I've tried to trace this back to see where it began because it wasn't always this way. Books used to be shelved by genre in fiction, and by Dewey in non-fiction. My guess (and it's only a guess) is that once upon a time there wasn't much in the way of current, popular fiction written about black people by black people. There was Terry McMillan...and there were others, but she was the big household name. Lots of people came int...
Read more