Infrequent Ordering: Adult Graphic Novels

By -
I covered some of this ground in Getting Started with Graphic Novels, but I wanted to revisit the topic for a more in-depth look at how I choose what adult graphic novels to purchase. As I mentioned, I use a variety of review sources and websites, including:

  • Library Journal, Booklist, Publishers Weekly
  • The A.V. Club, Graphic Novel Reporter, Paste, NPR, i09, Diamond
  • Eisner nominees and other lists curated by organizations like YALSA
  • New York Times bestseller lists (and occasionally reviews from NYT or LA Times)
Since I only order graphic novels one or two times a year, I needed a method to keep track of the items that are reviewed or listed over the course of the year. To do this--surprising to no one, I'm sure--I use a spreadsheet. When I encounter a potential purchase, I record the publication year, author, and title, as well as the review source. 

The Spreadsheet Approach in Action
On the far left, I assign stars based on how much weight I'm giving a certain title. Something like Rasl might have only been reviewed in Publishers Weekly at the time I updated this spreadsheet, but other volumes of the series have circulated well. A title gets a star if it has a starred review. If it's reviewed favorably in two sources, it gets a star. If I know it's something I MUST order, it gets a zillion stars. In the same spreadsheet, I also have a list of ongoing series to order/check for needed replacements. 

When it's time to place the order, I sort the spreadsheet by the star column in descending order. I spend a certain amount of money on series continuations and replacements. Then I begin evaluating the items with the most stars:
  • Did I already order that? This happens more often than I would like, despite the fact that I try to take titles off spreadsheet when I purchase them.
  • Did one of my colleagues already order that for the YA or juvenile collections? Or for a branch library?
  • Do other system libraries outside Springfield own that item? Do they currently have holds? What has the circulation been like?
  • Do we already have something by that author? What has the circulation been like? Is it missing?
I try to balance several things when ordering adult graphic novels. As the largest public library in this part of the state, I believe we have a responsibility to order some things that other libraries can't afford to get. On the other hand, I'm not going to buy items that my browsing patrons--and the adult graphic section gets a lot of in-house use--wouldn't be interested in. I also have to balance "highbrow" graphic novels that are critical hits (some of which have been real duds on the shelves) with long-running and sometimes enormous series and popular comic-book titles. At one of the branches, I'm slowly growing the collection of Walking Dead titles held, three or four items at a time. 

Every year, I order only a fraction of the items that I've recorded on my spreadsheet. I had almost $1,000 to spend for the Central Library this year, and barely scratched the surface with an order consisting of 85 items. My spreadsheet of potential purchases still has 1100 items on it that I haven't bought for the library. 

This year, as usual, I made careful selections, trying to balance everything as well as I could. And then I asked for more money so I could make sure I got all the possible titles off this list (shared by my friend Kristin). As you can see on that snippet of spreadsheet above, the ratio of male to female authors on the list of reviewed items is usually pretty skewed toward the male end. I do my best to keep this in mind when I'm ordering graphic novels. 

What's your approach to ordering something when it's not on a monthly basis?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tips for Weeding Your Reference Collection

By -
If you are responsible for collection development in just about any size or kind of library, the chances are good that there's been a recent push to reduce the size of your print reference collection.* Print reference materials are, to use a regional expression, wicked expensive. They are also being used less and less as librarians turn to databases and patrons turn to the immediate gratification of the internet. As budgets decline and libraries look to use their space in new and creative ways, physical reference collections are obvious targets for heavy weeding. Here at my library, we are reducing our reference collection by 50%. At our branches, reference collections will be cut by 75% . . . this time around. So where do you start when you are lucky enough to get the assignment to chop chop chop? Before You Begin Get a firm idea of how much the administration wants to reduce the reference collection. Survey the collection and determine how much you're going to have to weed
Read more

The black shelves are over there.......

By -
Speaking of collection maintenance... A question that has come up time and time again (in the real world, in the twitter world, on blogs, at conferences...) is the idea of separate shelving for African American books. If you follow me on twitter, you've heard this rant before. Why do we segregate books by skin color, blah blah blah. And, really, it isn't even the skin color of the character that matters, but the skin color of the author . You won't find the Derek Strange books (by Pelecanos...go read them now!) the AF-AM section. I've tried to trace this back to see where it began because it wasn't always this way. Books used to be shelved by genre in fiction, and by Dewey in non-fiction. My guess (and it's only a guess) is that once upon a time there wasn't much in the way of current, popular fiction written about black people by black people. There was Terry McMillan...and there were others, but she was the big household name. Lots of people came int
Read more

What the Heck is Denewing?

By -
Image
"Denewing" is the term I invented for the process of taking books from the new shelf and changing their status to, for lack of a better word, "not-new." Sure, I could farm the work out to other people in my library, but it's never been clear to me why I would when denewing presents the perfect opportunity to see what has been circulating, how many times, and (thanks to Evergreen, our new ILS) the last library at which an item was checked out. Plus, peeling stickers = therapeutic. Denewing is something I can do on desk while I help people with their various computer issues. Denewing also makes your new shelves look better. Because space is at such a premium in most public libraries (although regular weeding could help with that-- cough ), the New Shelf is the place where we have the best opportunity to showcase what we're buying and catch people's attention. The new shelf should be positioned somewhere where it will catch patrons' eyes and shout (it
Read more